Constituting America: Lesson Three: The Constitution, We Read Article II

by gary on Wednesday, April 21, 2010 12:00 EDT

Welcome to day three of our journey! Lesson two dealt with the Legislative Branch of government outlining the duties and requirements of Congress, and restrictions placed on it. As you know, our founders created three equal branches of government: The Legislative Branch, the Executive Branch, and the Judicial Branch.

Today’s reading involves the Executive Branch, the presidency. The text below represents the original spellings, and punctuation.

Article. II.

Section. 1.

The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows:

Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two Persons, of whom one at least shall not be an Inhabitant of the same State with themselves. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately chuse by Ballot one of them for President; and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said House shall in like Manner chuse the President. But in chusing the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representation from each State having one Vote; A quorum for this purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall chuse from them by Ballot the Vice President.

The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the Same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.

The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation, which shall neither be increased nor diminished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.

Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:–”I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Section. 2.

The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments.

The President shall have Power to fill up all Vacancies that may happen during the Recess of the Senate, by granting Commissions which shall expire at the End of their next Session.

Section. 3.

He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; he may, on extraordinary Occasions, convene both Houses, or either of them, and in Case of Disagreement between them, with Respect to the Time of Adjournment, he may adjourn them to such Time as he shall think proper; he shall receive Ambassadors and other public Ministers; he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.

Section. 4.

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

Although we’ll be reading the various amendments as we go, I think it’s important to point out that Section 1, Paragraph 3 is superseded by the 12th Amendment. This has to do with the election of the President and Vice President:

AMENDMENT XII

Passed by Congress December 9, 1803. Ratified June 15, 1804.

The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate; — the President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted; — The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. [And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President. --]* The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

*Superseded by section 3 of the 20th amendment.

The 20th Amendment further refines the presidency and vice presidency as it pertains to terms and eligibility. The part referenced above, highlighted with the asterisk, is superceded by the text below:

If, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term of the President, the President elect shall have died, the Vice President elect shall become President. If a President shall not have been chosen before the time fixed for the beginning of his term, or if the President elect shall have failed to qualify, then the Vice President elect shall act as President until a President shall have qualified; and the Congress may by law provide for the case wherein neither a President elect nor a Vice President shall have qualified, declaring who shall then act as President, or the manner in which one who is to act shall be selected, and such person shall act accordingly until a President or Vice President shall have qualified.

While duties and responsibilities are outlined, most of Article II deals with qualifications and the election of the Executive. The founders left the Executive quite a bit of room to govern.

As you probably know, there has been some concern whether Barack Obama meets the qualifications to actually serve as President. This is centered on Section 1, Paragraph 5:

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

The controversy settles around two issues. The first is transparency, Though Obama campaigned on it, we know that was a joke, and his regime operates almost completely in the dark. Most activities that Americans are accustomed to seeing disclosed are hidden from the American people by the regime.

The other issue is Obama’s personal history. Of course, the media has worked over time not covering issues such as his radical associations and shady business dealings. It’s quite remarkable, in fact, to note the lengths the regime’s media partners will go to not report on things, and cover up others.

It’s Obama’s life before the presidency that is a real blank. Unlike every other President, all of Obama’s records, from his birth certificate, to college transcripts, selective service documents, law records, medical records, even his Illinois Senate records have been judged completely and totally off limits. To use a word Obama seems to love, it’s unprecedented in American history. No other high profile official, let alone President has gotten away with this sort of thing, until now.

It’s the “natural born citizen” requirement that is causing some to have issues. We have now gotten into the Clinton era definition of what “is” is.

When Barack Obama and John McCain first became candidates, long time democrat operative, Phil Berg, filed a lawsuit against each man. Berg contends that neither Obama nor McCain are “natural born citizens.” and thus neither man is eligible to be President.

The story with McCain is simple. Senator McCain comes from a long line of Navy men. His father, a Commander at the time, was stationed in the Panama Canal Zone. To complicate matters, Senator McCain was not born on the naval base, he was born in a civilian hospital on Panamanian soil.

Of course, as both parents were American citizens, Senator McCain was indeed an American citizen, and since both of John’s parents were “natural born” themselves, this was not a real issue. In fact, McCain produced a file copy of his original birth certificate, and the Senate even passed a non-binding resolution declaring McCain a “nature born citizen.” Not that it actually carries any legal weight. But it was done, at any rate.

The problems with Obama are many, and frankly we think he has purposely keeps the controversy going, as a way to discredit adversaries. Pretty easy to label someone a “birther” a loon, and dismiss everything they have said.

Now rumors have Obama being born in Kenya. This sort of thing isn’t helped because some Kenyan officials, probably hoping it will help tourism or something, have also claimed Obama was born there. So has some of his family. Hard to prove.

This is further complicated by the insane Hawaiian laws regarding “certificates of live birth.” Under Hawaiian law at the time, you could have been born on Mars and your parents could have been given a “certificate of live birth,” which is different than a birth certificate.

Making this even more complicated is the fact Obama’s half sister, Maya Soetoro-Ng, who we know, for sure, was born in Indonesia to Obama’s mother and step father, also has the very same Hawaiian “certificate of live birth” as Barack.

BTW, Obama has spent a little more than a million dollars through his attorneys Perkins Coie, fighting the dozens of cases challenging his eligibility in court. It costs roughly $15 to get a certified vault copy of a Hawaiian birth certificate.

Again, in our opinion Obama enjoys this controversy, because it immediately neutralizes a large portion of Americans who oppose his regime.

We feel he was most likely born in Hawaii, as advertised, but honestly, who knows!

This is not the only problem with Obama’s eligibility though, and this is where we get into what the meaning of “is” is.

Our founders meant for our President to be “natural born.” Just being a citizen, even a person born on American soil, was not good enough. They rightly understood the American President must have allegiance to America and to America only. We couldn’t have a “citizen of the world” as our leader, for obvious reasons. One can be true only to the United States. Our nation demands 100 percent loyalty from it’s President.

We see the many complications brought about by a “post-American” presidency unfolding before our eyes! Barack Obama holds no allegiance to America, or her people. He is a strict ideologue. Only his ideology matters to him.

Unfortunately, the Supreme court has refused to hear cases challenging Obama’s eligibility, even though dozens are out there and several have made it to the Court.

Now again, we do believe Obama was born in Hawaii and only uses this issue to his advantage. We feel the Obama regime keeps this issue alive as a way of defusing other issues and de-legitimizing those who would raise them. It’s a win-win for him, and no one is ever going to call him on it. No one.

However, the place of his birth is not nearly a contentious of an issue as is the birthplace of his father, Barack Obama Sr. You see, Obama Sr. Was born in Kenya and as Kenya was a British colony at the time Obama Jr was born. In many scholars opinion, Obama Jr. actually holds a duel U.S./British citizenship, by virtue of his father’s British citizenship. This would render Obama ineligible.

We find this an interesting concept and really think the Court did America a grave disservice by refusing to hear these cases, based on this theory, and once and for all defining who, exactly, is a “natural born citizen.” It would be nice to know, in the future, just who is and who isn’t eligible. .

We seriously doubt this will ever be resolved one way or the other.

Of course, Barack Obama and John McCain aren’t the only two who have ever faced these questions. When Barry Goldwater ran for President he faced the same questions. You see, when Goldwater was born, Arizona had not yet achieved statehood. So as you see, the opportunity for Congress, or the Court, to further define who is and who isn’t a “natural born citizen” has been with us for some time, but Congress, and the Court, have passed on this opportunity.

We find the whole thing interesting and complicated by the fact that Barack Obama has no particular allegiance to the United States or the American way of life. In fact, it’s his desire to destroy the American way of life, as we know it, that has prompted all of us to rise up in protest, and go on the journey of relearning our First Principles, and our founding documents.

Although we mention it here, because it is interesting, and most definitely an unsettled question, we urge readers to focus on more pressing issues and not get too bogged down with the “natural born citizen” question. Legal scholars have tried to get a ruling on this, and have been denied at the highest level.

Better to put in a solid effort toward defeating the Obama regime and the progressive-Marxist ideology at the ballot box. Defeat the Marxist-democrat Congress, thus neutralizing the Obama regime, and then defeat Obama in 2012.

Defeat every progressive, for every office, at every level, and the issues with Obama and his regime will take care of themselves!

OK, back to the Constitution and Constituting America, as always, feel free to discuss this amongst our readers and visit Janine’s website, and join in on the discussion, here.

Tomorrow we’ll read Article III which deals with the Judicial Branch of government.

Article written by

Tollgrade1 April 21, 2010 at 12:29

You said: "Senator McCain was not born on the naval base, he was born in a civilian hospital on Panamanian soil.."

You are relying on the "birth certificate" that is online and that says that McCain was born at Colon Hospital. That is a forged document. McCain has always said that he was born at the family hospital on the Naval Base in the Canal Zone. Sadly, however, McCain did not post his birth certificate, so there is no proof. It is possible that he lost his birth certificate. In any case, the "Colon birth certificate" is a fraud.

Unlike McCain, Obama posted the official birth certificate of Hawaii. Yes, the Certification of Live Birth is the official birth certificate of Hawaii (http://www.starbulletin.com/columnists/kokualine/20090606_kokua_line.html), and the facts on the document–that he was born in Hawaii in 1961–were twice confirmed by the top officials of the Department of Health of Hawaii.

gary April 21, 2010 at 13:18

Actually, it's Obama's birth certificate that has been proven to be a fraud, at least the one he posted online. It was mererly a cut and paste job. Computer generated. There is no mention of the hospital, no doctors or nurses listed, nothing.

Frankly, we tend to believe Obama was born in Hawaii, but there is a whole lot of reason for others to doubt that.

I'm more interested in the fact that his father was a British subject, and by treaty, this makes Barry a dual citizen. It's troubling the Court passed on making a ruling here. Of course, they had the opportunity to somewhat better define this question in the case of Goldwater, when questions arouse about his eligibility.

Barack Obama is the only person for whom it seems asking pertinent questions of is somehow a crime.

Frankly, other than getting some sort of real world definition of what being a "natural born citizen" really means, and who should be considered.

The fact of the matter is Barack Obama is incredibly anti-American in his thoughts and deeds. The ideology of the Obama regime is un-American, plain and simple. As we wrote, we feel that pursuing the "natural born" issue is a waste of time and a distraction. Obama has caused enough destruction and pulled enough stunts that defeating him on the merits of his record in office will be simple enough.

Tollgrade1 April 21, 2010 at 12:34

You also said: 'In many scholars opinion, Obama Jr. actually holds a duel U.S./British citizenship, by virtue of his father’s British citizenship. This would render Obama ineligible."

If this were true, the Chief Justice of the United States would not have sworn in Obama. In fact, it is not true, the citizenship of a parent has no effect on Natural Born status, and a foreign law has no effect on Natural Born status (it is liberals, not conservatives, that think that foreign laws have weight in the USA).

To believe that a Kenyan or British law on citizenship takes away something that any US child normally would have is to imply that a foreign government can decide who will and who will not become the president of the USA. If Mexico, say, were to pass a law making all the children born in Texas also citizens of Mexico, that would make the children dual nationals. But it would not take away their ability to be president.

gary April 21, 2010 at 13:07

This is simply YOUR opinion, just as others have a different opinion. We feel the Supreme Court absolutely failed the nation. No less than five cases questioning Obama's eligibility, made it all of the way to "conference" at the Supreme Court. This included several that question this on the basis of Obama Sr.'s status as a non-American. (he was never even a legal resident.

This is not in inconsequential question, and the court owed it to the American people to settle this question, once and for all.

Conference, BTW, is where the nine Supreme Court justices meet to decide which cases they will hear. This is generally done on Fridays.

Chester April 21, 2010 at 17:56

RE: " We feel the Supreme Court absolutely failed the nation. …This is not in inconsequential question, and the court owed it to the American people to settle this question, once and for all. ( gary April 21, 2010 at 17:07 )"

Not only failed the nation but as Alen Keyes puts it on one of his internet published videos, they committed “dereliction of duty”. The judicial branch is out of control. They take advantage the life-time appointments.

Also, lower court judges do not deserve more praise than the SCOTUS colleagues. They are hell-bent protecting BHO's secret and would not rule on merit at the eligibility lawsuits. They use the very flexible Standing Doctrine to weasel out of their responsibility. They took oaths to protect the constitution. Instead they are using the Standing Doctrine they make the very same constitution unenforceable. They are the ones to blame for the destruction – yet this issue is hardly ever mentioned nowdays.

RE: Maya

You may want to recheck your sources. It is only a rumor that she has the COLB. If you find real evidence please report it here.

RE: Your theory that hiding the documents is a deliberate strategy to crystallize opposition.

On this issue we disagree. Leo Donafrio is right that it could be a strategy to avert attention from the dual-citizenship issue.

Tollgrade1 April 21, 2010 at 20:40

What are you proposing to do? The US Congress has confirmed Obama's election unanimously. The Chief Justice swore him in. The Supreme Court threw out all of the cases you mention. The state and federal district and appeals courts have thrown out all the cases so far (one count I saw said that there were more than 60 cases thrown out). Not a single congressman or senator has proposed an investigation. You have no support from Ann Coulter, Bill O'Reilly or Beck. The Wall Street Journal laughs at birthers.

There is an official birth certificate from Hawaii for Obama, and the officials in a Republican governor's administration repeatedly confirm its accuracy.

Such senators as Graham and Shelby say that EVERY child born in the USA is a Natural Born Citizen. So does Black's law dictionary. No law or court has ever ruled that dual nationality has any effect on citizenship or for that matter on much at all (except in some cases you do not have to pay both countries' taxes).

Ron Devito April 22, 2010 at 02:18

Gary wrote, "We feel he was most likely born in Hawaii, as advertised, but honestly, who knows!" Does not sound like a birther's statement to me.

Yes, the dispostions of the cases you referenced are as they are. Gary did a fine job delineating the issues surrounding the controversy in a fair and balanced way.

Obama – and Obama alone by how he has conducted various aspects of his life – is responsible for all these rumors. He has chosen to leave much of his life a secret. So, he sets himself up for all manner of speculation.

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: