Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin thrice said tonight that the Republican Party must contrast its free-market, capitalist principles with the Obama machine’s socialist, authoritarian welfare state policies during a single-segment TV interview with Eric Bolling from her home in Wasilla, Alaska. When asked if her husband, Todd consulted with her prior to endorsing Newt Gingrich last night, Gov. Palin responded, “No. The First Dude went Rogue. Todd is about hardhats, steel toes, and getting people back to work,” she said noting his involvement in vocational technology (vo-tech).
In her three statements pertaining to the GOP contrast of visions, Gov. Palin referred to Thomas Sowell and Adam Smith, both of whom wrote extensively about that subject. Her forebear, President Ronald Reagan once said “let there be bold contrasts, no pale pastels.”
In analyzing tonight’s New Hampshire primary election results, Gov. Palin said she expected that both “Gingrich and Santorum will have a better showing,” because South Carolina is center-right while New Hampshire is center-left. Both Gingrich and Santorum are vying for fourth place as of this writing with only 10% of the vote. Romney is leading at 38%, with Paul second in trail at 25% and Huntsman at 15%. Perry is barely clinging to 1%. Gov. Palin said she does not “think it’s game over yet” for the non-Romney candidates. She said the first time “there needs to be more aggressive debate” about the contrasting vision between free markets and free people and an authoritarian welfare state.
Gov. Palin said it was good to talk about Romney’s operation of Bain Capital now rather than have an October surprise, which is what the Democrats would have wanted. She also understood the other candidates taking shots at Romney since a superpac associated with him spent over $17 million on negative ads, particularly against Newt Gingrich.
Gov. Palin held steady on her reticence to endorse a candidate, despite Bolling’s attempts to get her to do so. “I’m waiting just like 60% to 70% of Americans…to see who is the best candidate to go against Obama and his $1 billion machine and 90% of the media.” Bolling suggested that with Mitt Romney’s solid financials, he might be in the best position to do so. Gov. Palin responded, “Romney may be the guy, but you never know. Things are volatile.” Gov. Palin reiterated her over-arching theme about contrasting between free markets, free people and an authoritarian welfare state, adding that the GOP has to unite around this contrasting message after the nomination.
In discussing Romney’s quip that he “enjoys firing people,” Gov. Palin said “capitalist policies are mutually beneficial, but you can’t deny there was tone deafness in his statement,” a phrase she twice said tonight. Gov. Palin then gave her third and final word on the importance of contrasting visions citing Sowell and Adams.
Bolling played a soundbite of David Axelrod saying he thought Romney would not have had the courage to pull the trigger on Osama bin Laden. “That was weak of David Axelrod to falsely accuse Mitt Romney of not being able to pull the trigger on Bin Laden,” she said. “Any of these GOP candidates would have done it.” When asked if a “President Palin would have done it,” she answered, “Absolutely! Without blinking an eye!” Gov. Palin said even Ron Paul would have though he is looking at being able to afford to have a strong military.
Video retrieved from SarahNET.




































She needs to be more specific on the differences…lay it out in lay man's terms.. So the ordinary Joe can get it… a lot of us (GOP) already know what she is talking about…but the public needs it broken down. I think she could do it …also I think she should endorse Newt and Newt should ask her to be his VP.
Sarah -when Bolling asked if you would run……….you looked like you want to !
You looked frustrated…like you want to, but maybe your family doesn't want you to.
If you really think you can pull if off & beat OBAMA, then for heaven's sake – get in & do it!!!
Stop making yourself miserable & go for it! Maybe Stephen Pidgeon is wrong!?
We have to get BHO & his Cronies out of the White House !
Run Sarah run! ………..we need you to get in & now!
You can beat Obama! You know you can!
merica will support you & you know it!
Time to run, Sarah. You look like you want to do it & beat OBAMA!
Go for it! ……….You know you have the support of America! God bless you & give you the strength!
RUN SARAH RUN VOTE ROGUE during primaries
100% for Sarah Palin and her Reconsidering, Join us on Facebook!
http://www.facebook.com/groups/161632243878738/
Deb, while I think Gov. Palin is best suited for the job, I am against protest voting. Gov. Palin is not running. She has stated numerous times she has no regrets about not getting in both on national TV and in writing to those who sent her letters and postcards on the subject. Voting for someone who does not want to run and who is not running is squandering a vote. Unless your effort is accompanied by a real ground game: visiting houses, calling, lit drops, etc., all you will accomplish is garnering a few votes and helping the strongest declared candidate in the race – currently Romney. The IA write-in got 2% of the vote. If 9 of those write in votes went with say Santorum, he – not Romney – would have been the victor. None of the foregoing is to suggest you stop supporting Gov. Palin in any way shape or form. We should support her activities. We should defend her record and her character when they are attacked. This extends to her family and staff. We should donate to SarahPAC. We should buy her products, her family's products and products related to the Palins and Heaths.
Looking forward to reading more. Great blog. Want more.
Comments on this entry are closed.